Krishnarjuna

The first half is slow and boring. The second half has some good moments between Nag and Vishnu but the climax turns into predictable mode. Read More

Even Nag's potential was not fully utilised. Nag as the modern Krishna, in fact would have made for an interesting viewing. Read More

Keeravani's music is not very impressive. Camera work is okay. Vishnu has used computer graphics and visual effects heavily to give the film chic look. They are impressive too. Read More

Nagarjuna gave a good performance all through the second half as his entry was only at the interval bang. He showed perfect comedy timing, his dialogue modulation is very casual, his body language is typical and he would remain a big asset for the success of the movie. Read More

Disappointing direction from P. Vasu. All major aesthetic and commercial elements, from narration, performances, music, romance and humor suffer as a result. Read More

First half of the film is spent on establishing the character. Songs are okay but comedy is boring. Film picks up any pace after the entry of Nagarjuna in the second half. Overall, second half is better than the first half and the movie stands average. Read More

Vishnu is ok in his shoes. He needs to cut down his weight still. Nagarjuna is given a God's role and that is just ok. As the overall drama in the movie didn't bring conviction, his role also didn't get any aura. Read More

The film starts slowly bit picks up pace after the interval. Comparisons with 'Dhee' are inevitable but would be totally unfair. Nags modern God role and Mohan Babus cameo make Krishnarjuna a welcoming film as a multi-starrer. Visual effects is another major plus point. Read More